Here we see what other ages would call witchcraft; others would deem paganism. Both are accurate. Her own words show one who thinks that the individual consciousness is the highest authority in defining and setting the terms of discourse:
Just as it is a myth that women are .meant. to be feminine and men masculine, that penises and vaginas are .meant. for penetrative heterosexual sex (or that mouths, anuses, breasts, feet or leather, silicone, vinyl, rubber, or metal implements are not .meant. for sex at all), it is a myth that ovaries and a uterus are .meant. to birth a child.
When considering my own bodily form, I recognize its potential as extending beyond its ability to participate in a normative function. While my organs are capable of engaging with the narrative of reproduction . the time-based linkage of discrete events from conception to birth . the realm of capability extends beyond the bounds of that specific narrative chain. These organs can do other things, can have other purposes, and it is the prerogative of every individual to acknowledge and explore this wide realm of capability.
And so, we see that paganism in its multifarious forms is a huge and real presence is the opening years of the twenty-first century, whether in the shape of a Scimitar, or in performance "art". Those who fall away from the grace of God do so in high predictable gradients of various "fruits of the flesh," as Saint Paul called them in the Letter to the Galatians, leading finally to the place of sacrifice (Gr. thumos).
But those who cringe, calling Ms. Shvarts "sick" should ask: what is the qualitative difference between her self-conscious "art" and the abortion industry that carries out the same weird alchemical machinations day in and day out?
1 comment:
You've hit the nail on the head.
Post a Comment