Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Littlest Victim - Heresy of 'Choice'

Dan Gilgof asks an interesting question: Why did Obama use "children" over "fetus" to describe the unborn?
One line in particular in President Obama's Notre Dame speech really jumped out at me: "Let's provide care and support for women who do carry their children to term."

Obama used the word children as opposed to fetus, employing the nomenclature of antiabortion activists as opposed to that of the pro-abortion-rights movement. If the fetus is a child, antiabortion advocates say, how can you justify abortion?

... Is the president subtly invoking the antiabortion lexicon in addressing conservative religious audiences? Or am I reading too much into this? (US News)
I agree with the American Papist who says, 'You see, abortion advocates are happy to use the term "child" to describe a "wanted" child. In other words, for them, a child is not a "child" until the mother has made a choice to keep it. Otherwise a "child" remains a "fetus" until he or she takes their first breath of air.'

In other words, 'fetus' is another word for disposable person. It is a sacrificial term.

No comments: