Thule Society
Paul Belien (regardless of the funny business and on-going argument with LGF -- I don't know who is right or wrong, and, frankly, I don't care. Get along!) wrote for the Washington Times this article entitled,
Nazis and Islamists. It augments and fills in spaces favorably with all posts mentioned and contained in
”Inhuman Infidels R Us”. From the article:
“Had Charles Martel not been victorious,” Hitler told his inner crowd in August 1942, “then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.” Hitler told Albert Speer that Islam is “perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament.” If the Muslims had won in Tours, the whole of Europe would have become Muslim in the 8th century and “the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of [Europe]. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire.”
The structural comparison between Nazi and Islamist paganism is inescapable. The
undertow of the primitive Sacred form of religion was vast and murderous in the former and gathering momentum in the latter. It threatens to carry even "moderate" religionists into its maelstrom of sacred violence and ruin, just as it did German citizenry in World War II. How can it be stopped if political leaders of the west continue their denial and ignorance of this reality?
No comments:
Post a Comment